Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 22.06.2025 03:57

Just in the last 5 years:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What’s next?
Austria’s deadliest mass shooting: Who are the Graz victims, shooter? - Al Jazeera
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Thank you.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What do you think of the Quora group "It's Ok to Be White" for people who are proud of being white?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ford recalls 1M vehicles over backup camera glitch - MLive.com
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.